(Cross-posted at Pax Americana)
More than a few things that I've read on the Internet have made me angry lately, and for me, that's not a very good thing. When I get angry, I get ridiculously angry, and it's usually accompanied by a surge in blood pressure that I can actually feel followed shortly thereafter by a slashing headache cutting across my left temple. And I'm not one of those people who can turn anger into constructive energy so don't even suggest it. Anger's like some kind of psycho groupie stalker with me - if I give it the time of day it starts popping up all over my life, usually at the worst possible moment.
But still, stories like this one bring out the worst in me. This one didn't do wonders for my serenity either, especially considering that I know the people involved. (I'm still trying to get my head around that last incident - who gets in a guy's face when the other guy is carrying a kid?) Reading these stories I find myself wishing I had been there, my absurd reveries being accompanied with all kinds of macho self-puffery: "Hey, if these fuckers want to start beating up liberals they can start with this one! Come on, bring it, assholes!"
Whatever. Whether or not I give myself an aneurysm is of no great import, but I know that I'm not alone in feeling this intense frustration. And that's really what we're seeing here: frustration. No one simply decides on the spur of the moment to follow you home and start bitching you out because you have a Kerry sticker on your car. Whenever I encounter someone like that, I try to remember that I'm simply getting the pointy end of a long line of bullshit that led to that moment. I'm don't do this in order to excuse the unhinged mouth breather in question but rather to keep myself from making the situation worse. Two pissed off people is always worse than one pissed off person. Always.
And yet, here I am, pissed off. I know exactly what's behind the pointy end of my long line of bullshit: genuine despair over the continuing gory clusterfuck in Iraq, feckless non-leadership by the people we elected with the express desire that they end the gory clusterfuck, the continuing public influence of those who would slander a brain-damaged twelve-year-old to make a vague political point, the fact that there are people in this country willing to beat strangers in the street in order to prop up our failed president, etc., etc., etc. I know I'm not the only one who feels this way. I've heard many liberal bloggers and some folks who actually spend time in the real world say we're heading for a replay of 1968 with its riots and suppression of political dissent. It's a tough point to argue. What bothers me is that some of us - myself included, at times - seem to look forward to this, to getting it all out in the open, to finally making the culture war a hot war. Over at The Crack Den, whenever someone (usually the never irksome Steve Simels) makes the 1968 comparison someone else usually chimes in with a sneering post that says something like, "This generation of sheeple will never spill blood."
Well, bully for the sheeple, then. I wasn't born until 1969 and I've never been in a riot, so I'm hardly an expert - but it seems to me that those riots were pretty one sided affairs with the guys carrying the tear gas and night sticks enjoying the upper hand. I can't imagine it being any better today now that they're equipped with microwave death rays and robot dragonflies of doom. Am I saying we should sit down and shut up? Of course not. And if you ever find yourself in a riot situation only you can decide how you should handle it. I'm just saying that let's not look forward to such an occurrence. Remember, someone who's expecting to get into a fight usually finds a way to get into one. Even Shakespeare's warlike mirror of all Christian kings, Henry V, would not seek a battle - of course, neither would he shun one.
Oh, and if some nutjob reading this meets me and decides he wants to get in my face for being a godless liberal, well, just don't, okay? Do me a favor. Just don't.